Sagittis sollicitudin turpis nullam rutrum commodo sagittis mattis donec adipiscing rhoncus quis feugiat quis venenatis tristique mi tempus
New mobile apps to keep an eye on
Auctor purus, aliquet risus tincidunt erat nulla sed quam blandit mattis id gravida elementum, amet id libero nibh urna nisi sit sed. Velit enim at purus arcu sed ac. Viverra maecenas id netus euismod phasellus et tempus rutrum tellus nisi, amet porttitor facilisis aenean faucibus eu nec pellentesque id. Volutpat, pellentesque cursus sit at ut a imperdiet duis turpis duis ultrices gravida at aenean amet mattis sed aliquam augue nisl cras suscipit.
- Commodo scelerisque convallis placerat venenatis et enim ullamcorper eros.
- Proin cursus tellus iaculis arcu quam egestas enim volutpat suspendisse
- Sit enim porttitor vehicula consequat urna, eleifend tincidunt vulputate turpis
What new social media mobile apps are available in 2022?
At elit elementum consectetur interdum venenatis et id vestibulum id imperdiet elit urna sed vulputate bibendum aliquam. Tristique lectus tellus amet, mauris lorem venenatis vulputate morbi condimentum felis et lobortis urna amet odio leo tincidunt semper sed bibendum metus, malesuada scelerisque laoreet risus duis.
Use new social media apps as marketing funnels
Ullamcorper pellentesque a ultrices maecenas fermentum neque eget. Habitant cum esat ornare sed. Tristique semper est diam mattis elit. Viverra adipiscing vulputate nibh neque at. Adipiscing tempus id sed arcu accumsan ullamcorper dignissim pulvinar ullamcorper urna, habitasse. Lectus scelerisque euismod risus tristique nullam elementum diam libero sit sed diam rhoncus, accumsan proin amet eu nunc vel turpis eu orci sit fames.
- Eget velit tristique magna convallis orci pellentesque amet non aenean diam
- Duis vitae a cras morbi volutpat et nunc at accumsan ullamcorper enim
- Neque, amet urna lacus tempor, dolor lorem pulvinar quis lacus adipiscing
- Cursus aliquam pharetra amet vehicula elit lectus vivamus orci morbi sollicitudin
“Sit enim porttitor vehicula consequat urna, eleifend tincidunt vulputate turpis, dignissim pulvinar ullamcorper”
Try out Twitter Spaces or Clubhouse on iPhone
Nisi in sem ipsum fermentum massa quisque cursus risus sociis sit massa suspendisse. Neque vulputate sed purus, dui sit diam praesent ullamcorper at in non dignissim iaculis velit nibh eu vitae. Bibendum euismod ipsum euismod urna vestibulum ut ligula. In faucibus egestas dui integer tempor feugiat lorem venenatis sollicitudin quis ultrices cras feugiat iaculis eget.
Try out Twitter Spaces or Clubhouse on iPhone
Id ac imperdiet est eget justo viverra nunc faucibus tempus tempus porttitor commodo sodales sed tellus eu donec enim. Lectus eu viverra ullamcorper ultricies et lacinia nisl ut at aliquet lacus blandit dui arcu at in id amet orci egestas commodo sagittis in. Vel risus magna nibh elementum pellentesque feugiat netus sit donec tellus nunc gravida feugiat nullam dignissim rutrum lacus felis morbi nisi interdum tincidunt. Vestibulum pellentesque cursus magna pulvinar est at quis nisi nam et sed in hac quis vulputate vitae in et sit. Interdum etiam nulla lorem lorem feugiat cursus etiam massa facilisi ut.
Brands are about communication. Communicating to the world about what they are about, stand for, and value. However, the tricky thing about brands is that they are influenced by their interactions with consumers and the public. At the same time, just like brands, language is simultaneously exact and fluid. Because of this, we at BrandGuard are routinely asked how we can determine if a piece of copy adheres to the Tone and Voice located in the brand style guide.
Let's look at an example. Two brands might use the same words to define their brand but use subtly different definitions of those words. For instance, two brands might both define themselves as "Personable" and "Simplistic". Let's call them Brand A and Brand B and examine their differences in definitions.
Brand A
Personable: We want customers to feel like they are talking to an old friend. Language should be familiar and casual.
Simplistic: We use down to Earth language that could be understood by a five year old. Anything more complex should not be used.
Brand B
Personable: When speaking to customers, they should feel like their needs are being taken care of. We want to relate to people as to ease their stress and let them know that someone is watching out for them and their concerns.
Simplistic: We break down complex topics to their root representation. We convey large topics in easy to understand ways. We want to inform our customers and make them more knowledgeable.
Clearly, there is a difference in how these brands will communicate despite both using the same words for their brand values. Using different or expanded definitions of existing words is an area that can cause confusion. Here’s how the language might differ in addressing a customer concern:
- On-brand for Brand A but not Brand B: "Oops! Let's sort that out for ya."
- On-brand for Brand B but not Brand A: "We've heard your concerns and are dedicated to resolving them."
- On-Brand for both Brand A and B: "We're here to help. What's bugging you?"
- Not on-brand for Brand A and B: "Addressing the recent inquiries, we have implemented a multi-tiered solution."
While each of those statements is a way to address a customer's concern, they differ greatly in the Tone and Voice that are conveyed. Detecting and determining this type of nuance is a tough problem that many brands spend a lot of time working on and thinking about. Most people can discern the difference after the fact, and that’s the goal of just one BrandGuard’s models.
There’s a lot that goes into creating quality models that can automatically check the tone and voice of these two different brands. Naively, one might think, "Oh, I'll just use ChatGPT to understand the tone and voice of my brand after providing some definitions." Well, we ran that test across 500 samples for 10 brands, through various models, and the results are below.
GPT3.5: 54% Precision*
GPT4: 74% Precision*
Google PaLM2-Bison: 51% Precision*
BrandGuard System: 96% Precision*
How is this possible? First, we take the definition and put it into the context of our larger language understanding. This provides a compass for our other models and decision-making engines. Next, we use text samples that are in the style guide coupled with other samples that a brand has supplied. This part is core because, by definition, existing content that brands have released has passed the guideline requirements. These approved assets are encoded with information that demonstrates the correct application of the rules.
The question you might be asking is, well that's great, but what happens if we want to change our brand or tweak our tone and voice? How does your system work when there is no prior content to assist with? It is true that performance will improve with more samples, but we find that the best brands provide some samples in their style guide about what is on-brand and what is off-brand. The BrandGuard system extracts these samples, and you can provide more if you wish. The same process above still applies. It may take some work to tune a new brand direction, but we believe that BrandGuard assists brands in their decision-making of different "golden samples" by allowing them to iterate with real-time feedback.
Consistency in communication is the hallmark of successful brands. With BrandGuard at the helm, brands can be assured of a quality control system that meticulously checks their content, ensuring it captures their essence with unparalleled precision. Leveraging approved brand assets and understanding the intricacies of brand language, BrandGuard reviews messages to ensure they are unmistakably on-brand.
*Note: Precision is a variant of accuracy that represents the likelihood that when our system predicts something is on-brand, it actually is on-brand. Precision is a metric we use instead of accuracy because we believe that false positives are worse for a brand than false negatives. It is more harmful for our system to say something is on-brand when it is, in fact, off-brand than to say something is off-brand when it is actually on-brand.
